Xem mẫu
- “People want this change.”
“Monday morning we’ll turn on the new system and
they’ll use it.”
“A good training program will answer all of their
questions and then they’ll love it.”
“Our people have been through a lot of change—what’s
one more change going to matter?”
“We see the need for helping our people adjust, but we
had to cut something…”
“They have two choices: they can change or they can
leave.”
- The change may not occur.
People will comply for a time and then do things to
get around the change.
Users will accept only a portion of the change.
The full benefits of the project are never realized or
are realized only after a great deal of time and
resources have been expended.
- Driving Forces Resisting Forces
Present Transition
State Desired
State
State
Unfreezing Changing Refreezing
Force Field Analysis – Lewin, 1951 Figure 11.2
- Emotional
Response
active
anger
bargaining acceptance
stability
denial testing
shock
passive
depression
Time
Elizabeth Kubler- Ross, 1969
- People
Structure Technology
Task
Figure 11.4: Leavitt’s Model of Organizational Change
- Change may
◦ be an ending
◦ mean giving something up
◦ be stressful
◦ be easier for those initiating the change
◦ provide a basis for resistance and conflict
◦ change the “rules for success”
- Figure 11.3
- Sponsor
◦ Initiating vs. sustaining sponsor
Change Agents
◦ The project manager and team
Targets of Change
◦ The users
◦ Must understand
The real impacts of the change
The breadth of change
h What’s over and what’s not
w Whether the rules for success have changed
nguon tai.lieu . vn
