Xem mẫu
- Mobile Radio Networks: Networking and Protocols. Bernhard H. Walke
Copyright©1999 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISBNs: 0-471-97595-8 (Hardback); 0-470-84193-1 (Electronic)
14
Mobile Satellite Communication∗
14.1 Fundamentals
In principle communications satellites provide the same connectivity as ter-
restrial (wireless and wireline) networks. The advantages of satellites, such
as fast wide-area coverage, flexible transmission parameters and cost indepen-
dence due to distance, are compared with the disadvantages, such as restricted
channel capacity because of the frequencies available, orbital positions, need
for line-of-sight connectivity and high initial investment besides relatively long
signal propagation times. As a result, only certain application areas have been
developed for satellites in the past.
14.1.1 Application Areas
Satellites are being widely used for distribution functions, e.g., for transmit-
ting television and radio programmes as well as for data. Existing communi-
cations networks can be totally bridged through the use of satellite systems.
Satellite communication, which until recently was almost only exclusively used
for navigation and aviation as well as in land vehicles, is a branch that opens up
a totally new world of applications. Satellite paging along with GPS (Global
Positioning System) and GLONAS have recently been introduced for civil use.
The interest in global personal communications is leading to big efforts in the
development of new satellite systems that operate at the low orbital heights.
Currently mobile satellite systems are being used mainly in areas where
no other terrestrial communications systems are available (on the open seas,
in the desert, in rural regions, etc.). These systems are also attractive to
users who operate internationally and otherwise use different kinds of terres-
trial mobile radio systems, requiring them to carry terminals with different
standards.
A differentiation is made between worldwide, regional and national systems,
depending on the coverage area of a satellite system. In terms of institutional
and organizational structure, a distinction is made between international, na-
tional and private operators of satellite systems. Tables 14.1–14.5 present a
compilation of the known parameters of all systems currently in development.
∗ With the collaboration of Branko Bjelajac and Alexander Guntsch
- Table 14.1: Narrowband satellite systems concentrating on telephony applications—Part 1
716
System Globalstar ICO IRIDIUM Odyssey Ellipso ECCO (later:
Aries)
Company Loral, Qual- ICO Global Motorola TRW, Teleglobe Mobile Constellation
comm, Alcatel Communications Canada Communications Inc., Telebras
Espace Holdings
Orbit LEO (circular) MEO (circular) LEO (circular) MEO (circular) MEO LEO (circular)
(circ. + ell.)
Path altitude [km] 1414 10 355 780 10 354 520–7846 (ell.) 2000
8040 (circ.)
No. of sats. + spare 48 + 8 10 + 2 66 + 12 12 + 2 on the 14 + 3 11 + 1 (later
sats. Ground add’l 35 + 7)
No. of orbits 8 2 11 3 3 (2 ellipt. + 1 1 equat. (later
circular) add’l 7)
No. of ground 100 12 21 7 ≥ 20 11 (more later)
stations
14
Inclination [°] 52 45 86 50 116.5 (ellipt.)/ 0 0 (later 62)
(circ.)
Min. elevation [°] 10 10 10 20 25–30 5
Cells/sat. 16 163 48 37 61 32
ISL — — 4/sat. — — —
Access methods CDMA FDMA/TDMA FDMA/TDMA CDMA CDMA CDMA
Duplex method FDD TDD
Cluster size 6 180 (global) 6.3
5 (USA)
4 (Europa)
Error handling FEC FEC FEC FEC
1
r = 1–2
3
MS: r = 43
r= 1
2
Voice: r = 1
2
1
Grnd.st.: r = 2
Data: r = 14
Mobile Satellite Communication
- Table 14.2: Narrowband satellite systems concentrating on telephony applications - Part 2
14.1
System Globalstar ICO IRIDIUM Odyssey Ellipso ECCO (later:
Aries)
Modulation QPSK QPSK QPSK BPSK
No. of channels/sat. 2700/ 4500/ 4070/2.4 kbit/s 2800 1000
2.4 kbit/s 4.8 kbit/s
Fundamentals
No. of channels in entire 130 000 45 000 283 000 27 600 11 000 (later
system 46 000)
Channel bandwidth [kHz] 25.2
Transmission rate [kbit/s] 2.4–9.6 4.8–38.4 2.4 2.4–9.6 0.3-9.6 bis 9.6
Voice transmission rate 2.4/4.8/9.6 4.8 2.4 9.6
[kbit/s]
Bit-error ratio voice/data 10−3 /10−6 10−2 /10−3 10−3 /10−5 10−3 /10−6
Frequency UL [MHz] 1610–1621.35 1980–2010 1621.35–1626.5 1610–1621.35 1610–1621.35 1610–1621.35
Frequency DL [MHz] 2483.5–2500 2170–2200 1621.35–1626.5 2483.5–2500 2483.5–2500 2483.5–2500
Bandwidth UL+DL [MHz] 27.85a 70 5.15 27.85a 27.85a 27.85a
Frequency GW–Sat [GHz] 5.091–5.25 5.15–5.25 29.1–29.3 29.1–29.4 15.45–15.65 5.05–5.25
Frequency Sat–GW [GHz] 6.875–7.055 6.975–7.075 19.4–19.6 19.3–19.6 6.875–7.075 6.825–7.025
Satellite weight [kg] 450 2300 689 2000 689 & 877 425
Antenna type Planar horn Planar Dual refl.
Satellite intelligence Available Available Available No No No
Satellite transmission mode Transparent Regenerative Regenerative, Transparent Transparent Transparent
switching
Transmitter power [W] 1100 5000 1430 4500 2300 815
Power reserve [dB] 3–10 dyn. 16 6
Max. delay [ms] 11.5 8.22 44.3
Eavesdropping security Possible High Possible
717
- 718
Table 14.2: Narrowband satellite systems concentrating on telephony applications—Part 2 (continued)
System Globalstar ICO IRIDIUM Odyssey Ellipso ECCO (later:
Aries)
Terminal (mobile) Dual-mode Dual-mode Dual-mode Dual-mode Dual-mode Dual-mode
Terminal trans. power [W] 3.8
Services Voice, data, Voice, data, Voice, data, Voice, data, Voice, data, Voice, data,
fax, RDSS, fax, RDSS, fax, RDSS, fax, RDSS, fax, RDSS, fax, RDSS,
SMS SMS SMS SMS SMS SMS
RDSS accuracy [km] 0.3–2 0.5
Coverage area 74° S–74° N Global Global Global 55° S–90° N 23° S–23° N
(later global)
Availability [%] 90–95 90–95 99.5 (User)
99.9 (Grnd.st.)
No. of users [Mill] 2–5 1.4 2.3 1.0 > 1.0
14
System cost [Mill. US$] 2.6 2.6 4.4 3.2 0.9 0.55 (later 1.7)
Price of terminal [US$] 750 1000 2000–3000 550 1000 1500
Cost/min [US$] 0.35–0.53 1–2 3 0.65 0.12–0.5
Start comm. operations 1998 2000 1998 1998 2000 2000
Useful life [years] 7.5 12 5–10 15 5 5
German partners DB Aerospace Vebacom
Licence 01/95 granted 10/95 01/95 granted 01/95 granted 06/97 granted 06/97 granted
by FCC frequency alloc. by FCC by FCC by FCC by FCC
by ITU
a The UL and DL frequency bands are occupied by CDMA systems simultaneously
Mobile Satellite Communication
- Table 14.3: Narrowband satellite systems concentrating on message transfer
14.1
System Orbcomm E-Sat Faisat GE Starsys GEMnet LEO One
Company Magellan Sys- Echostar Final Analysis, GE Ameri- CTA Orbital dBX Corp.
tems, Teleglobe, Communica- Polyglott Enterp., can Comm., Sciences
Orbital Science tions VITA CLS North
America
Fundamentals
Orbit LEO LEO LEO LEO LEO LEO
Path altitude [km] 775 1260 1067 1000 950
No. of satellites 28 + 8 6 26 + 4 24 38 48
No. of orbits 8 6 4 8
No. of ground stations min. 1 per country USA 3,
others in
other
countries
Inclination 45° 50°
Intersatellite links — — — — — —
Access method CDMA CDMA
Transmission rate [kbit/s] 0.3–2.4 UL: 1.2–19.2 2.4–9.6
DL: 1.2–38.4
Frequency uplink [MHz] 148–149.9 Fin. An.: 455–456, 148–149.9 148–150.05
459–460
VITA: 148–149.9
Frequency downlink [MHz] 137–138 400–401 (Fin. An. 137–138 137–138
and VITA)
Bandwidth UL+DL [MHz] 2.9 2.9 3.05
Frequency GW–Sat [MHz] 148–149.9 148–150.05
Frequency Sat–GW [MHz] 137–138 400.15–401
Satellite weight [kg] 46 80 125
719
- 720
Table 14.3: Narrowband satellite systems concentrating on message transfer (continued)
System Orbcomm E-Sat Faisat GE Starsys GEMnet LEO One
Terminal (communicator) × × × × × ×
Services (Monitoring, × × × × × ×
control, message transfer)
Coverage area Global N. America Global Global Global 65° S–65° N
14
System costs [Mill. US$] 0.35 0.05 0.25 0.17 0.16 0.25
Price of terminal [US$] 100–500
Start comm. operations 1998 1998 2002 1999 1999 2000
Useful life 4 5–7 5
Mobile Satellite Communication
- Table 14.4: Broadband satellite systems concentrating on data transfer
14.1
System Teledesic Celestri LEOa M-Star SkyBridge
Company Teledesic Motorola Motorola Alcatel Espace, Loral
Space & Comm.
Orbit LEO LEO LEO LEO
Path altitude [km] 1375 1400 1350 1457
Fundamentals
No. of satellites 288 63 72 64
No. of orbits 12 7 12 16
No. of ground stations 2 control + 6 antenna 6
centres, many GWs
Inclination 40° 48° 47°
No. of cells per sat. 576 260
Intersatellite links 8 per sat. (visual) 6 per sat. (visual) 4 per sat. No
Access method DL: Asynch. TDMA DL: FDM/TDM
UL: MF-TDMA UL: FDM/TDMA
No. of channels per satellite 125 000 at 16 kbit/s
No. of channels in total Simult. 36 Mill. Simult. 395 000 at 64 kbit/s,
system in total 1.8 Mill. users at
64 kbit/s
Transmission rate [Mbit/s] UL: up to 2, DL: up to Up to 155.52 2.048–51.84 0.016–60
64
Frequency UL [GHz] 28.6–29.1 and 28.6–29.1 & 29.5–30 47.2–50.2 14–14.5
27.6–28.4a
Frequency DL [GHz] 18.8–19.8 and 18.8–19.8 & 19.7–20.2 37.5–40.5 11.7–12.7
17.8–18.6a
a Motorola in 1998 has joined the Teledesic consortium
721
- 722
Table 14.4: Broadband satellite systems concentrating on data transfer (continued)
System Teledesic Celestri LEO M-Star SkyBridge
Bandwidth UL+DL [MHz] 2600 2000 6000 1500
Frequency GW–Sat [GHz] In above band In above band In user-sat. band 12.75–13.25 and
13.75–14 and 17.3–17.8
Frequency Sat–GW [GHz] In above band In above band In user-sat. band 10.7–11.7
Terminal Fixed terminal (Ant.-Ø Fixed terminal Terminal Fixed terminal
0.16–1.8 m) (Ant.-Ø 0.66–1.5 m)
Trans. power terminal [W] 0.01–4.7
Services Multimedia, video, data Multimedia, video, data Data, high-rate network Multimedia, video, data
connection
14
Coverage area 95 % of area and 100 % 70° S–70° N (with Global Global
of population Celestrib global)
System costs [Mill. US$] 9 12.9 6.1 3.5
Start comm. operations 2002 2002 2002 2002
Useful life [years] 10 8
Licence from FCC Granted March 1997 Application accepted Application accepted Application accepted
a Gigalinks
b The Celestri system consists of the Celestri-LEO, M-Star and Millenium (GEO systems)
Mobile Satellite Communication
- Table 14.5: Broadband GEO satellite systems concentrating on data transfer 14.1
System Spaceway Express- Millenium Astrolink GE Star PAC 1–8 Inmarsat-3
way (Celestri- and Galaxy
GEO) Sat.
Company Hughes Hughes Motorola, Lockheed GE PanAmSat Inmarsat
Vebacom Martin Comm. Americom Contractors
Orbit GEO GEO GEO GEO GEO GEO GEO
Fundamentals
Path altitude [km] 35 786 35 786 35 786 35 786 35 786 35 786 35 786
No. of satellites 9 (Type 14 4 9 9 16 5
HS702)
No. of different satellite 5 5
positions
No. of ground stations 7
No. of cells per sat. 48 44
Intersatellite links Yes Yes No
Access method UL: TDMA/ UL: TDMA/
FDMA FDMA
DL: TDM DL: TDM
No. of channels per sat. 276 480 at 64 at
16 kbit/s 125 MHz, 4 at
250 MHz
No. of channels in total 248 832 588 000 576 at
system 125 MHz
Transmission rate [kbit/s] 16–6000 16–9600 384–40 000
Frequency uplink [GHz] 28.35–28.6 V- and 29.5–30 28.35–28.6 and 28.35–28.6 5.925–6.425
and Ku-band 29.25–30 and
29.25–30 29.25–30
Frequency downlink [GHz] 19.7–20.2 V- and 18.55–18.8 19.7–20.2 19.7–20.2 3.7–4.2
+ 5 GHz Ku-band and + 5 GHz + 5 GHz
in-band 19.7–20.2 in-band in-band
17.7–18.8 17.7–18.8 17.7–18.8
723
- Table 14.5: Broadband GEO satellite systems concentrating on data transfer (continued)
724
System Spaceway Express- Millenium Astrolink GE Star PAC 1-8 u. Inmarsat-3
way (Celestri- Galaxy Sat.
GEO)
Bandwidth UL+DL [GHz] 2a 1.25 2a 2a 1
Frequency GW–Sat [GHz] In-band In-band In-band 14.0–14.5
user-sat. user-Sat. user-sat.
Frequency Sat–GW [GHz] In-band In-band In-band 11.7–12.2
user-sat. user-sat. user-sat.
Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal
(Ant.-Ø
0.7 m)
Services Multimedia, Video, data Data, video, Data, video, Voice, data, Voice, data,
video, data, broadcast Internet audio fax, multi- fax, Pos. det.
voice media,
RDSS
14
Coverage area Continents Global America Global America, Global 70°§–70° N
ex. parts of Europe,
Russia Asia, West
Pacific,
Caribbean
System costs [Mill. US$] 3.2 3.9 2.3 9 4 0.69
Price of terminal [US$] 1000 Several 100
Start comm. operations 2000 2001 2000 In operation since 1997
Useful life [years] 15 11 13
Licence from FCC 05/97 05/97 05/97
a Several systems share frequency band
Mobile Satellite Communication
- 14.1 Fundamentals 725
14.1.2 Satellite Organizations
Until now, the commercial operations of international satellite systems have
almost exclusively been carried out by state-run operating companies such as
Intelsat, Eutelsat and Inmarsat (see Appendix B). The primary responsibility
of Intelsat is to provide regular radio services worldwide, namely telephony
and data links as well as the transmission and distribution of TV and radio
programmes. Satellites for regular radio services specifically for Europe are
operated by Eutelsat (European Telecommunications Satellite Organization).
The organization Inmarsat (International Maritime Satellite Organization)
was set up to provide a worldwide maritime satellite radio service.
These operating organizations are all structured in a similar way. They
are based on international agreements that were ratified as national law by
the participating countries. These member countries establish the objectives
of the organization and entrust national telecommunications authorities or
operating companies with creating satellite earth stations. The satellite or-
ganizations of the countries have no customer contact, but instead provide
satellite capacity and, among other things, specify the frequency ranges avail-
able for the operation of satellite systems. The operating companies design
the satellite services for the customers.
State-run operators of satellite systems are competing against private op-
erators, international companies and consortia, which mainly concentrate on
implementing new concepts such as worldwide satellite-based mobile commu-
nications systems. These organizations focus on providing almost complete
wide-area coverage of the earth’s surface using Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and
Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) satellite systems. Some of these satellite systems
are introduced in the following sections, accompanied by advantages and dis-
advantages of geostationary and non-geostationary satellite systems.
14.1.3 Satellite Orbits
Path height is possibly the most important aspect of describing satellite sys-
tems. As shown in Figure 14.1, the categorization breaks down into LEO,
MEO, Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO) and Geostationary Orbit (GEO) systems.
LEO system satellites are located between a height of 200 km and the inner
Van Allen belt (named after James Alfred van Allen, b. 1914, an American
physicist. The Van Allen belts are two radiation belts of the earth (zones with
high-intensity ionizing radiation)) at a height of 1500 km. The satellites of
the MEO systems are located between the two Van Allen belts, between 5000
and 13 000 km. LEO and MEO satellites are in circular orbits. In addition
to the circular systems, there are also HEO systems that are able to achieve
a better coverage of densely populated areas using elliptical orbits without
having to forfeit the advantages of low orbits.
During the 1960s, developers of the first systems started discussing the
advantages and disadvantages of LEO, MEO and GEO systems. The technical
- 726 14 Mobile Satellite Communication
MEO Systems
ICO, Odyssey (10360 km)
Inner Van Allen
HEO System Belt
Earth
LEO Systems
IRIDIUM, Teledesic LEO System
(780, 700 km) Globalstar (1400 km)
Outer Van Allen Belt
GEO Systems, e.g., INMARSAT (35 786 km)
Figure 14.1: Orbits of satellite systems
advantages of LEO systems, such as lower signal propagation times and path
loss, were weighed up against the practicability of geostationary systems. The
first test satellites such as TELSTAR operated in the lower orbits. Before the
mobile applications of satellites were considered as a possibility, GEO systems
were viewed as being superior. The satellite launches, particularly during the
1960s, were still unreliable and global coverage was less important than it is
today, so the GEO systems, which can manage with only one satellite, were
favoured. With interest in mobile communications over satellites increasing,
there was a renewed effort to speed up the development of systems with low
earth orbits.
14.1.4 Elevation Angles and Coverage Zones
With LEO satellite systems the radio coverage zone on the ground is divided,
following the usual cellular principles, into individual cells by a satellite to
allow the reuse of frequency bands within the entire coverage zone. The size
of the illuminated zone is established by the minimum elevation angle min ,
which can be determined from the maximum possible distance between a
mobile terminal and the satellite (see Figure 14.2).
The elevation is
re + h
= arccos sin φ (14.1)
d
- 14.1 Fundamentals 727
§¨¥ © ¨§¦¤¡
© ¥£
h
d
re
ε
re φ
¡ ¢
¥$#¦ §¥§
% £" !
Figure 14.2: Elevation angle in LEO systems
°
Theoretically, elevation angles of 0 are possible. However, there is a tendency
to maintain the minimum elevation angle min , which for practical reasons
°
is typically at 10 to avoid larger areas without radio coverage because of
shadowing [12]. The radius of a coverage zone depends on the earth’s radius
re and the path height h of the satellite above the earth’s surface:
re
rcov = re arccos cos min − min (14.2)
re + h
With a given maximum distance dmax and a minimum elevation min , the
orbit height works out as
h= d2 + 2dre sin
max min
2
+ re − re (14.3)
The area covered by the satellite is then
2
Acov = 2πre (1 − cos φ) (14.4)
These equations can be used to determine the radius of the coverage zone,
the orbit speed of the satellite and the travel time around the earth. If the
number of cells per coverage zone is available then the size of the cells can
be established and an initial prediction made about the amount of time a
user spends in a cell. The above values for some orbit heights are given in
Table 14.6. For example, an IRIDIUM satellite (at a 780 km height) travels at
approximately 28 500 km/h over a stationary earth point, and is only visible
from there for about 10–12 min (see Figure 14.39).
14.1.5 Frequency Regulation for Mobile Satellites
Frequency allocation is an important aspect in the planning of satellite sys-
tems. Since it is the international authorities who allocate the frequencies,
- 728 14 Mobile Satellite Communication
Table 14.6: Circular satellite orbits
Orbit height Travel time Orbit speed Radius of coverage
[km] [km/s] zone [km]
400 1h 32 min 7681 1333
600 1h 36 min 7569 1737
800 1h 40 min 7463 2065
1000 1h 45 min 7361 2349
1200 1h 49 min 7263 2592
1400 1h 54 min 7168 2805
2000 2h 07 min 6906 3320
35786 23 h 56 min 3075 6027
operators of global satellite systems must negotiate licensing agreements with
all the countries in which they want to offer their services. Member states
of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) are committed to the
resolutions of the World Radio Conference (WRC).
Commercial satellite radio is currently using frequencies mainly in the C-
and Ku-bands. In the C-band these are 5.925–6.425 GHz range for the uplink
and 3.7–4.2 GHz for the downlink; and in the Ku-band they are 11.7–12.2 GHz
for the downlink and 14–14.5 GHz for the uplink. Because of the growing
interest in satellite communications, additional frequencies in the S- and the
K/Ka-bands were reserved for satellite radio at WRC 1992. The frequency
bands 1980–2010 for the uplink and 2170–2200 MHz for the downlink were
made available in the S-band for the satellite segment of UMTS. With the
availability of 3.5 GHz of bandwidth each (27.5–31 GHz and 17.7–21.2 GHz),
this means that considerably more bandwidth is now available in the Ka-band
than was provided in the previous frequency bands.
Since the initial networks are mostly being built by American companies,
applications for licences are first made to the American regulatory body, the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). These licences then establish
the pattern for regulation in other countries. Accordingly, the first frequencies
allocated by the FCC for mobile satellite systems were in the 1610–1626.5 MHz
band. As is shown in Figure 14.3, 5.15 MHz was allocated to the IRIDIUM-
TDMA system and 11.35 MHz to the CDMA systems to be shared by Odyssey
and Globalstar. In case only one of the CDMA systems becomes operational,
the frequency band 1616.25–1621.35 MHz will be renegotiated.
14.2 Geostationary Satellite Systems
The geostationary orbit is at an altitude of 35 786 km above the earth’s surface.
Satellites in this circular orbit have an angular velocity that is the same as
the rotational speed of the earth. Therefore to an observer on the ground
the satellite is at in a fixed position. Because a geostationary satellite can
- easily be bridged.
• Coverage of large areas with only one satellite. Large distances can
• Simple configuration.
geostationary systems include:
The advantages of geostationary satellite systems compared with non-
can follow these positional changes better than mobile stations.
bodies, positional corrections are essential for the satellite. Ground stations
drift up to 60 km from its position owing to the influence of other celestrial
Figure 14.3: Frequencies for satellite radio
© ¨ § ¥£ §
¤¤¢¦¤¢ r ¥
©¤¨¤§¢¦£¢ s r
i s tx ir t¤¤¢¦¤¢
s © ix ¨ § ¥ £ ¡
u x
f Y
g e` ¤g
f d ¤g h `g g`g e ¤g f `c d `c
E%U5
& # T
¤ ¨ ¤ ¨ ¤¤
¨
¤¤¢¦¤¢
© ¨ § ¥£ ¡ ¤¤¢¦¢
© ¨ § ¥£ © ¨ § ¥
¤¢£ F
s yi yi s rir s ii s
stx stp tp s u s ur s u s yr s
u x qx vr yr vr
uq qiq x
u u u u
f Yc
Yc
h `c g Yc c `c e `c f d h
&EUT5
% #
¤ ¨ ¤ ¨
¨ ¤¤
¨ ¤¨¤ ¤ ¨ ¤ ¤ ¨ ¨
¨ ¤¤
WQ 1
R5E'P ( C! 7 F
!
DE$! 59`7 £ 59 a 6 1CG F
% # B A 7 B b
'$! b59 ¦£ B`Y¤¦6
D % # B a 79 B
¡ § RW Q ! 3 3 4
¤C E¤C¤"E'P ( "5"3
d d
'U `¤gY`c c g
Y `¤Yd`c fc
`g ```d`c ecd
```c
EC! `7Y¤B6
D% # B 9 D%
E#C! ¤5@¤86
B A9 7 7
! 3 3 3 2 1 !
5"45¢$0) X W § V T SP RQQP © 2 !
¤§5'Q ¤¤ U¤E¤'EEIH¢1CG F
r © ¨ § ¥
¤¤¢¦£ ( © ¨ § ¥£
¤¤¢¦¤
w ee
`¤h`g ee g
`¤`g `e`¤g
e e `e``c
e f ipr eed
```c
r r ip
s y q ivw s tp iq
f u qix iq q u
&'#$"
% !
¨
¤ ¨ ¤¤ ¨
¤ ¨ ¤¤ ¨ ¤
¨ ¤
729 Geostationary Satellite Systems 14.2
- 730 14 Mobile Satellite Communication
• Minimal routing problems in the coverage areas because of coverage
zones of the satellites.
• The low relative movement of the earth only causes insignificant Doppler
shifts of the signals.
The disadvantages of using a GEO system are as follows:
• A need for high transmitter power and large receiving antennas (because
of the distances attenuation is at approximately 200 dB).
• Regions at a very high geographical latitude cannot be serviced. The
elevation angle, which decreases the higher the latitude, falls below an
elevation of 10◦ at a degree of latitude ϕ > 72◦ , so that perfect connec-
tion can no longer be guaranteed. For example, in Germany (47 –55 ° °
° °
North) elevation angles between 20 and 30 are achieved.
• Coverage to urban areas is a problem because of shadowing. Reception
in these degrees of latitude is only possible through the use of directional
antennas.
• Signal propagation times are large because of the large distances. One
way propagation delay is approximately 125 ms. Therefore ARQ (au-
tomatic repeat request) data link control protocols with error handling
designed for wired networks are not suitable.
• It is expensive to launch satellites into a geostationary orbit compared
with lower orbits.
These disadvantages are dominant as far as utility of GEOs are concerned
for mobile communication. Such orbits are primarily suitable for stationary
services.
European telecommunications network operators use the Inmarsat satellite
system operated by Inmarsat, an organization established in 1979 with its
headquarters in London and supported by 63 member countries. The mobile
radio services offered by Inmarsat were initially restricted to maritime appli-
cations. Inmarsat is still the only supplier today that offers global mobile
satellite communications on the sea, on land and in the air.
The Inmarsat satellite system consists of 11 satellites: 4 operating satel-
lites and 7 reserve satellites. Reserve satellites can be leased from different
organizations.
All Inmarsat satellites are located in a geostationary orbit. The four oper-
ating satellites are distributed in the equatorial plane so that they can cover
the entire globe, except for the polar regions. The reserve satellites are located
in positions in the immediate vicinity of the operating satellites so that they
can be replaced if necessary.
The four coverage zones of the operating satellites are the West Atlantic, the
East Atlantic, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific. As can be seen in Figure 14.4,
- 14.2 Geostationary Satellite Systems 731
Figure 14.4: Configuration of Inmarsat operating satellites
there is a difference in how much the coverage zones overlap each other. The
largest overlap is between the West Atlantic and the East Atlantic. The reason
for this is to provide better servicing of the large traffic between America and
Europe.
14.2.1 Inmarsat-A
The Inmarsat-A service caters for the following applications:
• Self-dialled telephone connections from/to user terminals.
• Self-dialled (half-duplex) telephone connections from/to user terminals.
• Calls to terminals and retrieval of data stored in terminals. The infor-
mation is provided only if the caller provides unique identification.
• Use of telephone connections to transmit fax messages and data (up to
9600 bit/s with a modem).
• Data transfer from terminals at a data rate of 64 kbit/s.
• Special applications for broadcast transmission, video freezing frames
and commentator transmission routes.
Inmarsat-A is the first of six systems being operated by Inmarsat. It went into
operation in 1979, and transmits analogue modulated signals. Portable termi-
nals require a parabolic antenna of approximately 1 m diameter and weighing
20–60 kg. With stationary terminals the antennas are adjusted by hand in
the direction of the desired satellite.
- 732 14 Mobile Satellite Communication
Table 14.7: Technical data on Inmarsat systems
Inmarsat A B M C Aero
Channel access Aloha Aloha S-Aloha Aloha Aloha
Modulation BPSK QPSK BPSK BPSK BPSK
Coding BCH 1/2 FEC 1/2 FEC 1/2 FEC 1/2 FEC
Transmis. rate [kbit/s] 4.8 24 3 0.6 0.6
14.2.2 Inmarsat-B
The Inmarsat-B system has been in existence since 1993 as a further develop-
ment of Inmarsat-A, the major improvement being the change over to digital
transmission. The traffic channels transmit digitally using forward error cor-
rection. It has greatly improved the quality of voice and data transmission.
The frequency band and the capacity of the satellites are being used more
economically. Improvement in satellite technology have produced a reduction
in the transmission costs for a call. The communications services offered by
Inmarsat-B are comparable to those of Inmarsat-A (see Table 14.7).
14.2.3 Inmarsat-C
Inmarsat-C was developed for worldwide telex and data transmission (X.25)
from small mobile terminals. The following applications are some of those
available:
• Data transmission in X.25 mode from/to mobile terminals (Mobile Earth
Station, MES) at data rates of up to 600 bit/s.
• Text transmission from the MES in X.25 mode and output of messages
on fax equipment.
• Data transmission in X.400 mode to mailboxes.
• Position location of MES by a central switching centre.
• Formation of closed user groups through the allocation of appropriate
telephone numbers.
The net bit rate transmitted in both directions is 600 bit/s. Dynamic inter-
mediate storage (store-and-forward transmission) located in the earth station
guarantees reliable data transfer. An earth station automatically makes an-
other request for erroneous or missing data blocks. The data blocks are not
forwarded to the receiver until the message has arrived error-free at the des-
tination.
Signals are scrambled and spread by the sender to reduce tramsmission
errors that occur owing to fast fading. The length of messages is limited to
32 kbytes, primarily because of the intermediate storage.
- 14.3 Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems 733
The terminals used in the Inmarsat-C service are relatively small and weigh
approximately 5 kg. They consist of a transmit/receive antenna unit for all
directions, a transmitter/receiver, an operating unit and a printer (if required).
The power consumption in receiving mode is 25 W and in sending mode 100 W
pulsed.
14.2.4 Inmarsat-Aero
The Inmarsat-Aero service, which was introduced in 1992, enables communi-
cation from and to airplanes (see also the TFTS service in Section 4.1). Two
types of antenna are available:
• Low-gain antennas (0 dBi) for data transmission, mainly for internal
operating purposes for airplanes.
• High-gain antennas (12 dBi), which allow higher data rates, thereby
enabling voice links to the ground.
14.2.5 Inmarsat-M
The Inmarsat-M service, a digital expansion of the Inmarsat-A service, has
been available since 1993. Inmarsat-M terminals are small and considerably
lighter in weight than Inmarsat-A terminals. Mobile radio users can make use
of the following communications services:
• Telephone • Data transfer (up to 4800 bit/s)
• Fax • Variations of the Inmarsat-C service
Because of the low transmission rate of 3 kbit/s, the voice quality with
Inmarsat-M is poorer than in connections with Inmarsat-A and -B. Because
of the terminal’s smaller antenna (30–50 cm) and lower transmitter power,
the gain in the Inmarsat-M system is 8 dB less than with Inmarsat-A. It was
necessary to reduce the data rate to 3 kbit/s to achieve good transmission
quality despite the poor power budget.
14.3 Non-Geostationary Satellite Systems
The advantages of LEO and MEO/ICO systems compared with GEO systems
are:
• Lower transmitter power required because of low orbit heights.
• Higher average elevation angle. Because of the large number of satellites,
the satellite with the shortest distance to the mobile radio user can
always be selected.
- 734 14 Mobile Satellite Communication
• High operating reliability through increased redundancy.
• Good coverage of regions with highest geographical latitude (e.g., polar
regions).
• Small signal propagation time.
However, there are also disadvantages due to the lower orbits:
• Short link duration to satellites due to changing elevation angles.
• Smaller coverage area per satellite.
• Complex system control.
At their nearest point to earth (perigee), HEO satellites approach up to
a couple of hundred kilometres from the earth’s surface in order to be able
to reach the furthest distance (apogee) in the area of the geostationary orbit.
They are used there for communication purposes because that is where their
orbit speeds are the lowest and a satellite therefore remains visible for a long
time from a certain point. Satellites in these orbits are always passing through
the Van Allen belt and are consequently subject to increased radiation.
14.3.1 ICO
In September 1994 Inmarsat founded a company called ICO (Intermediate
Circular Orbit) to introduce and operate the Inmarsat-P21 project (see Ta-
ble 14.1). ICO’s biggest investors are INMARSAT (150 million US$) and
Hughes Space and Communications (94 million US$). The ICO system is
the only mobile satellite system that has been initiated by an operator of an
existing satellite system.
°
ICO will be using 10 satellites in two orbits with 45 inclination to the
equatorial plane (see Figure 14.22; the coverage zones of the ICO system are
shown in Figure 14.5). Maximum use will be made of path diversity. It is
very probable that two satellites will be visible at the lower elevation, and the
satellite with the best channel quality will be selected. It is anticipated that
the greatest proportion of users of the ICO system will be accessing through
GSM dual-mode terminals, and will use the satellite system only if the GSM
network cannot guarantee an adequate radio connection.
ICO will be dispersing 12 earth stations (Service Area Nodes, SAN) across
the globe (see Figure 14.6), and these will be interconnected over a broadband
network (P-network). Because there are no plans for links between satellites,
the P-network will forward wide-area connections to the nearest network gate-
way, which will create the link to other networks such as PSTN, PLMN and
PSDN.
The terrestrial terminal and control (TT&C) stations are responsible for
operation and maintenance of the satellites, as well as for control of the config-
uration through position tracking. Data (such as battery state and position)
nguon tai.lieu . vn