- Trang Chủ
- Xã hội học
- Failure of public participation for sustainable development: A case study of a NGO's development projects in Chonburi province
Xem mẫu
- Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 38 (2017) 331e336
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences
journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/kjss
Failure of public participation for sustainable development:
A case study of a NGO's development projects in Chonburi
province
Thanawat Pimoljinda*, Ritthikorn Siriprasertchok
Graduate School of Public Administration, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This paper investigates the importance of landscape analysis in designing the public
Received 15 March 2016 participation process for rural sustainable development projects, using a case study of a
Received in revised form 4 August 2016 non-governmental organization (NGO)'s development projects in Chonburi province.
Accepted 10 August 2016
Mixed methods were applied, using focus group and in-depth interview techniques with
Available online 20 October 2017
the former members of a community-based organization and the NGO's staff members,
and quantitative data derived from 250 questionnaires which were gathered from the
Keywords:
former targeted group of that NGO. The results of this research found that the lack of
non-governmental organization,
impact of landscape analysis on the spatial distribution or density of the target population
physical landscape,
had become a significant intervening obstacle in promoting public participation. It has also
public participation,
resulted in a proportionate discontinuity of the process of the development projects.
rural development,
Specifically, the size of and the space between human groupings, together with the
sustainable development
different physical environments of each specific area, have resulted in some targets
becoming marginalized from full participation in the development project. Additionally,
some other target areas were not willing to join the project due mainly to their way of life
and economic conditions, and these two factors are in turn the result of the geographical
environment.
© 2017 Kasetsart University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access
article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/
4.0/).
Introduction protection and natural resources management, whereby
community engagement in the development processes is
In the last few decades, balancing the dynamic inter- encouraged (Carlsson & Berkes, 2005; Lowe, Ray, Ward,
action between rapid national economic growth and rural Wood, & Woodward, 1998; Oakley, 1995; Pieterse, 1998;
community development has been increasingly and Tango International, 2009).
considerably of concern to both governmental and non- In the case of Thailand, public participation in the
governmental agencies. Their main purpose is to maintain development process was initially promoted around 1982,
a state of sustainable development. This has become a during the launch of the 5th National Economic and Social
substantial scheme of developing countries for their Development Plan (Office of the National Economic and
poverty reduction policies (Elliott, 2006; Kates, Parris, & Social Development Board [NESDB], 1982). Most of the
Leiserowits, 2005) together with environmental targeted communities were poor and marginalized, and
differed in landscape, natural resources, and socioeconomic
conditions. Not only have government policies been put
* Corresponding author.
into practice, but there have also been many non-
E-mail address: thanawatp@buu.ac.th (T. Pimoljinda).
Peer review under responsibility of Kasetsart University. governmental organizations (NGOs) working closely with
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.016
2452-3151/© 2017 Kasetsart University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
- 332 T. Pimoljinda, R. Siriprasertchok / Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 38 (2017) 331e336
rural people in these areas. A basic philosophy underlying been much in debate is to what extent each of the disci-
the efforts towards sustainable development of such NGOs plines and approaches should be integrated for imple-
is to promote community-driven development with the menting a development project in order to achieve the
aim of empowering villagers to be able to control the re- objective of sustainable development (Lowe et al., 1998;
sources needed for managing their own livelihoods. An Ramsey, Abrams, Clark, & Evans, 2013). With this initial
ultimate goal is that the target population would be pro- argument, this section provides the analytical factors
vided with a participation scheme in the development relating to sustainable development in the course of the
process and thus achieves self-reliance (Suthinarakorn & intercalation of the nexus between physical landscape and
Traimongkolkul, 2002). public participation in the development process.
To make the development process sustainable, based on
social development principles, public participation is a Public Participation
prime requirement, and the establishment of a
community-based organization for the sake of improving In a literal interpretation of “Our Common Future”, a
the rural people's livelihoods is usually a primary choice World Commission on Environment and Development
(Kates et al., 2005; Leeuwis, 2000; Lowe et al., 1998; report in 1987, the aim was to reduce some kinds of human
Oakley, 1995). Nevertheless, there are several examples activity to the extent where they might not affect the sur-
showing the abolition of community-based organizations rounding environment and natural recourses. Since then,
due to the lack of public participation in development the concept and its meaning as well as a possible mecha-
projects. The lack of people's interest due to their ways of nism for promoting sustainable development and the
life, economic conditions, and occupations has always been forms of indicators for measuring sustainability have
proposed by many rural development researchers as an repeatedly been deliberated upon, both at national and
important factor (Jaisue, 2014; Mala, Wongpreedee, international levels, from universities to national govern-
Thumkosit, & Dhirathiti, 2012; Shigetomi, 2006; ments and on the international stage (Elliott, 2006; Kemp,
Usavagovitwong, Jirawatthvee, & Chairattananondha, Parto, & Gibson, 2005; United Nations, 2010). Evidence for
2013). However, as observed, these researchers did not this could be perceived at the Rio conference in 2012,
pay enough attention to the essential determinant factors focusing on institutional arrangements and their capacity
which resulted in such problems. With this argument in to balance economic growth and natural resources, for
mind and applying the landscape analytical approach, the instance (Clemencon, 2012; Leggett & Carter, 2012).
findings of our research on an NGO's rural development These debates are directly and indirectly claimed to be
project which covers three sub-districts located in Chon- the result of non-linear dynamic changes in global and
buri province, Thailand, discovered a new factor which has national socioeconomic conditions, as well as globalizing
become a significant intervening obstacle in promoting environmental problems and increasing inequalities and
public participation. It is that the influence of geographic poverty (Clemencon, 2012; Department of Economic and
conditions has affected not only the settlement patterns of Social Affairs, 2013). These changes are unpredictable and
the people, but also determines the degree of public uncontrollable, and the effects would become a barrier to
participation in the development processes which has the development process at the local level and of course
resulted in the discontinuity of the development projects. sustainability as a result. In this regard, an alternative
Thus, the objective of this paper was to investigate the development has thus been promoted by various agencies,
importance of landscape analysis in designing the public especially by local governments and NGOs. Local
participation process for rural sustainable development community-based organizations, such as community co-
projects. Importantly, due to the interdisciplinary approach ops, occupational groups, and savings groups, are such in-
of the research, this paper could be useful to both NGOs struments, aiming at decreasing the impacts that might
and government agencies in their efforts to develop other result from the mainstream globalized world.
development projects in the future. This concept has widely been adopted in less-developed
and developing societies, from Sub-Saharan Africa to Latin
Theoretical Principles America and to Asian societies (Lowe et al., 1998). A
fundamental concept in this is based on the assumption
There seems to be a dichotomy between the two disci- that a top-down approach is not suitable with development
plines when we compare the theoretical foundations and constructed from below, as it is emphasizes a bottom-up
principles of social development with that of geography, approach with multi-stakeholder decision-making pro-
even though academics in these two disciplines put enor- cesses. Public participation, as many scholars have argued,
mous effort into studying the interaction between human is an essential requirement in realizing this concept
activities and their environment, or vice versa. In the cur- (Carlsson & Berkes, 2005; Leeuwis, 2000; Lowe et al., 1998;
rent state of socioeconomic conditions, which can be seen Pieterse, 1998). This is because participation from below
as much more complex and dynamic in ways that were not would not only loan legitimacy to projects in the eyes of the
evident in the past, interdisciplinary approaches to study- people who would be affected by the results of such
ing and implementing development projects are widely development, but it is also assumed that the results of
discussed in both fields (Elliott, 2006; Kates et al., 2005; development projects would more or less meet the needs
Pearce & Atkinson, 1998). of them all. With this in mind, projects which involve
Apart from considering the relevant fields to a devel- participation and gain willingness from the people may
opment area and putting such ideas into practice, what has possibly be sustained.
- T. Pimoljinda, R. Siriprasertchok / Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 38 (2017) 331e336 333
The Physical Landscape landscape. Quantitative data were also used to support the
qualitative analysis. In doing so, multiple sources of data
As noted earlier, a number of studies have proposed and information were systematically gathered and
analyses on how to manage local community-based orga- synthesized.
nizations (Shigetomi, 2006; Suthinarakorn & The focus group technique was conducted with 10
Traimongkolkul, 2002; Tango International, 2009). In- former members of the community-based organizations
vestigations of institutional models and mechanisms, as supported by that NGO. Purposive sampling was used to
well as management approaches to capacity building, and select the informants. Three informal community leaders
ways to build cooperation among members of such orga- from each sub-district were selected, while the other seven
nizations, is deliberately taken into account. However, a informants were selected from households in which their
significant underlying problem for this study is that even if main occupations were different and their houses were
development concepts focus on how to balance the dy- situated in different areas. Semi-structured interviews
namic interaction between human activities and ecological were conducted with 10 NGO staff members, who had
systems, they rarely analyze the physical contexts of the worked in such development projects. The data derived
target areas, as is implied in the works of Elliott (2006), from both focus group techniques and the in-depth in-
Lowe et al. (1998), and Ramsey et al. (2013). terviews were analyzed using content analysis.
As stated by Liu (2008), “the relationship between Quantitative data were derived from 250 questionnaires
human society and natural environment is a kind of eternal out of approximately 650 former targeted households in
basic relation in which the origin of relations between the three sub-districts. Based on Yamane (1960), the data
human and geography is geography at first, and then the were determined at 95% reliability. Proportional stratified
human follows”. The interpretation of this statement can random sampling was used to calculate the sample for each
cover not only the relationship between humans and the area, while a random selection technique was used to
physical environment in general, but also includes the dy- collect the data thereafter. With the questionnaire, the
namic interaction between human socioeconomic activity item-objective congruence (IOC) was calculated, which the
and available natural resources in particular. The evolution overall IOC scores were 0.830. The reliability of the ques-
of human societies is thus adaptive to natural environ- tionnaire was also calculated using Cronbach's alpha coef-
ments in a dynamic pattern. At the same time, geographic ficient, which the alpha level was 0.935. Quantitative data
environments have shaped the size of, and the space be- were analyzed in the form of number, percentage, mean,
tween, human societies, and have imposed degrees of re- and standard deviation.
striction on the connectivity between them (Linard, Gilbert,
Snow, Noor, & Tatem, 2012; Ramsey et al., 2013; Results and Discussion
Silbernagel, Martin, Gale, & Chen, 1997).
Consequently, the physical landscape, which has resul- In general, the physical landscape of the three sub-
ted partly in the spatial distribution or density of the district areas is a river basin suitable for cropping and
population, has shaped the particular needs of the people, livestock agriculture. There are also some industrial fac-
and has determined socioeconomic activities in such areas. tories and warehouses located nearby the project sites.
Apart from households' economic activities and occupa- Some residents work on their farms, while others work in
tions, it has also been an underlying determinant factor in factories. However, economic circumstances and the way of
shaping the aspirations and intentions of people to life are still considered to be poor, with most residents
participate in development projects promoted by govern- living below the national poverty line.
ment agencies or activists accordingly. Therefore, it can be At the onset, in accordance with the core value and
argued that the physical landscape is a significant factor strategy of this NGO in helping the vulnerable people and
which affects not only the settlement patterns of the peo- their family, the target population was selected based on
ple, but also determines the pattern of development pro- their income and living conditions. They were then invited
jects which should be designed for it. to join the development project from problem diagnosis to
activity designation, and then from project implementation
Methodology to project evaluation and reflection on the development
results, respectively. A sense of belonging was embedded
This investigation contains mainly qualitative research along with the development processes, with the aim of
conducted by means of a case study: an NGO's rural self-reliance and sustainable development. Nevertheless,
development projects, covering approximately 650 tar- according to the results of a reflection meeting after the
geted households in three sub-districts (Mabpong, Non- withdrawal of this NGO in 2013, it was revealed that most
ghong, and Nongkakha) located in Chonburi province, of the target populations are still living under poor condi-
Thailand. Significantly, in the first two years after the end of tions. For example, the data revealed that 72.23 percent of
a 10-year development period in 2013, almost all of the respondents earned a monthly income of less than
development projects were at a standstill, while some 20,000 baht and 80.95 percent of respondents had more
community-based organizations had been abolished. than four household members in their families. Specifically,
Therefore, this case study approach was deployed analyti- the development projects which were conducted
cally to analyze the principal factors which affected the throughout the 10-year period were at a standstill.
process of bolstering public participation in sustainable In addition, a significant problem that was revealed was
development, particularly the influence of the physical that numbers of those of the target populations who had
- 334 T. Pimoljinda, R. Siriprasertchok / Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 38 (2017) 331e336
joined the projects had declined after a few years of oper- distribution or density of the population, even if it is a
ation, and, in some others, the degree of member's partic- significant factor in the eyes of geographers (Dorling &
ipation was similarly in decline. After synthesizing the data Shaw, 2002; Linard et al., 2012; Ramsey et al., 2013). This
derived from the focus group, it was found that geographic was also reflected by the results of the case study. Refer-
conditions have played a significant role in impeding the ence to the data derived from the focus group technique
target populations' participation in the projects, and have with the former members of a community-based organi-
shaped the socio-economic conditions, the way of life, and zation indicated that there were two interrelated issues
sequentially affected the perception of target populations hindering them from joining the NGO's development ac-
on the importance of the NGO's development activities. tivities at the project sites. The first was the distance be-
According to the data, there were three interrelated tween their houses while the second was their main
factors affecting the process of public participation in sus- occupation, as reflected in Figure 1. These two issues were
tainable development, namely: (1) the conditions of the related to their occupations, with the intercalation of eco-
area and the dispersed settlement pattern which inhibited nomic conditions being subject to the topographic envi-
communication and caused inconvenience for the people ronment they live in, and this significantly affected their
in engaging in development activities supported by the ability and availability to participate in the project site.
NGO; (2) the diversity of settled areas caused difficulty in These observations can be explained by the data
establishing suitable activities needed for responding to the collected from the fieldwork. According to the data derived
targeted groups in diverse but specific areas, and; (3) the from questionnaires, 22 percent of the respondents were
imbalance between development activities needed for full time agriculturists of whom some had their own
development and the number of NGO staff led to ineffective farmland while others did not, but rented land. Another 65
engagement of the staff with the community for project percent of the respondents worked in industrial factories
monitoring and evaluation, as well as for the process of and warehouses close to their houses. This was due to the
project improvement. At the same time, the lack of people's lack of productive land. The remainder worked as em-
interest due to their ways of life, economic conditions, and ployees in small enterprises. An analytical explanation
occupations also affected the degree of public participation obtained from the fieldwork suggested that those who
in development activities. The results and discussion are worked on farms lived in a dispersed pattern quite far from
presented in three parts, as follows. the development project site. This, together with their
better economic conditions than those who worked in
Settlement Patterns and Economic Conditions factories and warehouses, made them unwilling to join the
development projects.
As discussed above, the human and physical environ- In contrast, the settlement pattern of those who worked
ments impact each other. However, as observed, many so- in factories was nucleated. Even if their houses were close
cial development researchers, including social together and close to project sites, working conditions still
development activists, have not paid much direct attention left them unavailable to participate in development pro-
to the impact of the physical landscape on the spatial jects. Considering these circumstances, in regard to the
Figure 1 Context of development area
- T. Pimoljinda, R. Siriprasertchok / Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 38 (2017) 331e336 335
development process, even if the data on the problems and action among the target population must be encouraged.
needs of the target populations had been available for This is similar to what Shigetomi (2006) stated, namely,
project design, ways to conduct projects would still be in “such projects malfunction after the outside agencies
doubt as would the best way to promote group building, retreat from the project site, suggesting that making or-
which may have paved the way to bolstering public ganizations is not the same as making a system of making
participation in the sustainable development projects. organizations”.
Based on the results of the research, it is suggested that
Project Design for Public Participation the settlement patterns influenced connectivity between
the target population and the project site, and, in some
It is a fact that rural development activity would not cases, imposed the type of activity that should be promoted
exist and continue without public participation. The people in a specific area. Another problem which resulted from the
can participate in, or be willing to join, development ac- settlement pattern was that the staff of the NGO could not
tivity if such activity is accessible for them (Shigetomi, regularly monitor the project sites and activities due to a
2006). In view of this circumstance, not only do lack of sufficient staff at all project sites.
geographic conditions affect people's occupations and their
households' incomes, but they are also an important pre- Conclusion
requisite condition for analyzing the design of develop-
ment projects for a specific area (Dorling & Shaw, 2002). In the case of community development, there are
Also related to this is that such development activity can be multifaceted influences of socioeconomic changes which
continued if it is designed to correspond with individuals' affect, to greater or lesser extents, development's progress
and households' needs. This is related to what Leeuwis and sustainability. More importantly, suitable solutions in
(2000) suggested, namely, each participatory approach is coping with such dynamic changes cannot depend solely
deemed suitable for a specific type of problem situation, in on instinct and experience, but require knowledge relevant
relation to which it aims to generate certain contributions. to the context of a specific area with an interdisciplinary
Continuing from the above discussion, project design approach to project design and implementation. As dis-
which can respond to people's ways of life is an important cussed in this article, socioeconomic conditions in each
issue for development activists to take into consideration. area varied from each other which is due partly to the
This is explicitly manifested through cases in which differences in physical landscapes and environments. This
development project designs were quite limited in variety has also been a significant determining factor for devel-
and did not thoroughly respond to the needs of the target opment activists to take into consideration during the
population, especially in generating household income. The process of project development and implementation, and it
main reason found was that, as limited by physical land- somewhat influences the continuity and sustainability of
scape, each area differed from others in both the environ- the development as a result.
mental and natural resources available. Insofar as there are
such differences between areas, promoting the full partic-
Conflict of Interest
ipation of the population in development processes must
be upheld, especially in the first phase of the process,
There is no conflict of interest.
namely, the analysis of social contexts and economic con-
ditions. However, as noted previously, public participation
was only partially successful, as some of the target popu- References
lation was living quite far from the project sites, and as
some were hindered by their occupational demands. A Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and meth-
result of this was, of course, a limitation in project design odological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(1),
65e76.
for promoting public participation and for implementing Clemencon, R. (2012). From Rio 1992 to Rio 2012 and beyond: Revisiting
development projects accordingly. the role of trade rules. Journal of Environment and Development, 21(1),
5e14.
Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2013). World economic and
Continuity of Project Implementation social survey. 2013: Sustainable development challenges. New York, NY:
United Nations.
If the continuity of project implementation is recog- Dorling, D., & Shaw, M. (2002). Geographies of the agenda: Public policy,
the discipline and its (re) ‘turns’. Progress in Human Geography, 26(5),
nized as a part of the requirements for successful sus- 629e646.
tainable development, promoting public participation in Elliott, J. A. (2006). An introduction to sustainable development (3rd ed.).
the implementation process is an essential issue. Parallel to London, UK: Routledge.
Jaisue, N. (2014). Factors related to the successful of sufficiency economy
this is the continuity of those who participate in project village (Research Report). Bangkok, Thailand: Dhurakijpundit Uni-
implementation (Mala et al., 2012; Usavagovitwong et al., versity Research Center.
2013). An argument is that even if those who first partic- Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowits, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable
development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment:
ipate in the project left the group, the project may be
Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8e21.
carried on as there are other participants who remain or Kemp, R., Parto, S., & Gibson, R. B. (2005). Governance for sustainable
there may be some new comers. However, implementation development moving from theory to practice. International Journal of
may not progress as it should, or may not be manifested in Sustainable Development, 8(1/2), 12e30.
Leeuwis, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural
ways that respond to the needs of the people as its development: Towards a negotiation approach. Development and
objective imposed at the onset. This means that collective Change, 31, 931e959.
- 336 T. Pimoljinda, R. Siriprasertchok / Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 38 (2017) 331e336
Leggett, J. A., & Carter, N. T. (2012). Rioþ20: The United Nations conference Ramsey, D., Abrams, J., Clark, J. K., & Evans, N. J. (2013). Rural geography
on sustainable development, June 2010 (Congressional Research Ser- erural development: An examination of agriculture, policy and
vice). Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42573.pdf. planning, and community in rural areas. Journal of Rural and Com-
Linard, C., Gilbert, M., Snow, R. W., Noor, A. M., & Tatem, A. J. (2012). munity Development, 8(3). (iev)
Population distribution, settlement patterns and accessibility across Shigetomi, S. (2006). Organizational capability of local societies in rural
Africa in 2010. PLoS One, 7(2), 1e8. development: A comparative study of microfinance organizations in
Liu, H. (2008). The research about dynamic relationship between human Thailand and the Philippines (IDE Discussion Papers, No. 47). Japan:
and geography. Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(3), 103e108. Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade
Lowe, P., Ray, C., Ward, N., Wood, D., & Woodward, R. (1998). Participation Organization.
in rural development: A review of European experience (Research Silbernagel, J., Martin, S. R., Gale, M. R., & Chen, J. (1997). Prehistoric,
Report). Newcastle, Australia: Center for Rural Economy, School of historic, and present settlement patterns related to ecological hier-
Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, University of Newcastle. archy in the eastern upper peninsula of Michigan, USA. Landscape
Mala, T., Wongpreedee, A., Thumkosit, U., & Dhirathiti, N. S. (2012). Role in Ecology, 12, 223e240.
collaborative work performance between community organization Suthinarakorn, W., & Traimongkolkul, P. (2002). Toward sustainable
councils and local government organization. Journal of Graduate development in agricultural: A reflection on the learning experi-
Studies Valaya Alongkron Rajabhat University, 6(1), 29e43. [in Thai] ences of NGOs in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal: Social Science, 23(2),
Oakley, P. (1995). People's participation in development projects: A critical 131e138.
review of current theory and practice (INTRAC Occasional Papers Series, Tango International. (2009). Sustainability of rural development projects:
No. 7). Oxford, UK: INTRAC. Best practices and lessons learned by IFAD in Asia (Discussion Papers,
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (1982). No. 8). Retrieved from http://www.ifad.org/operations/projects/
The fifth national economic and social development plan. Bangkok, regions/pi/paper/8.pdf.
Thailand: Office of the Prime Minister. Usavagovitwong, N., Jirawatthvee, M., & Chairattananondha, P. (2013).
Pearce, D., & Atkinson, G. (1998). The concept of sustainable development: Making informal settlement upgrading plan to action: A comparative
An evaluation of its usefulness ten years after Brundtland (CSERGE analysis of slow-changing community. Journal of Architectural/Plan-
Working Paper PA 98-02). Retrieved from http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/ ning Research and Studies, 10(1), 107e122.
cserge/pub/wp/pa/pa_1998_02.htm. United Nations. (2010). Sustainable development: From brundtland to Rio
Pieterse, J. N. (1998). My paradigm or yours? Alternative development, 2012. New York, NY: Author.
post-development, reflective development. Development and Change, Yamane, T. (1960). Statistics: An introductory analysis. Singapore: Harper
29, 343e373. International Edition.
nguon tai.lieu . vn