Xem mẫu
- International Journal of Management (IJM) Volume 7, Issue 1, Jan-Feb 2016, pp. 164–169, Article ID: IJM_07_01_017 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=7&IType=1 Journal Impact Factor (2016): 8.1920 (Calculated by GISI) www.jifactor.com ISSN Print: 0976-6502 and ISSN Online: 0976-6510 © IAEME Publication FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR BURNOUT AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS Dr. M. Surya Kumar Assistant Professor Periyar Institute of Management Studies (PRIMS) Periyar University, Salem-636011 ABSTRACT The burnout, the anxiety and the concern. Everybody have those flashes where we’re entirely dazed by huge load of work college demands. Many step forward to finish their work as as possible, we sometimes digress into a state of despair and self-doubt when our hard work isn’t giving us the results we want. At a certain stage, we start to sense so stranded and unhappy that we retreat into our shell, away from our peers and the people who care about us the most. We’re unfulfilled, disordered, isolated, and don’t have any idea of what we are up to. Eventually, with all loading on top of us one after the other, we snap (James H. Humphrey, 2003, [5]). Taking this in consideration the study is braces out to inspect the causes accountable for burnout of the college students. The present study is significant for the following reason: GARRETT ranking is used to rank which factor marks the high burnout and it is resulted that pressure & expectation and isolation regarding the work are the factors marking high burnout among the students, which will make the researchers and other people to know exactly about one of the factors which affects burnout among the students. Key words: College Demands; Depressed; Burnout Cite this Article: Dr. M. Surya Kumar. Factors Responsible For Burnout Among College Students. International Journal of Management, 7(1), 2016, pp. 164–169. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=7&IType=1 INTRODUCTION Psychosomatic information is considered as the valuation and a remedy for mental health hitches, it also points exactly towards considerate and cracking problems in many different ranges in routines of human life. Most of the psychologists are tangled in some kind of therapeutic role, practicing in clinical and counseling. Many do research on a huge array of area related to psychological thinking and behavior, and http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 164 editor@iaeme.com
- Factors Responsible For Burnout Among College Students work in university psychology departments or teach in other academic settings. Some people are engaged in industrialized and administrative settings and also in few areas likely, human expansion and aging, sporting, fitness, and the media, as well as in criminological investigation and other phases of law. CONCEPTUAL OUTLINE Burnout is a psychological term that refers to long-term fatigue and lessened interest in work. Burnout has been predicted to end result from persistent work-related stress (e.g., work overload). However, there is budding proof that it is multi-factorial in nature, with dispositional factors playing key part. This is particularly a reason that burnout is awkwardly close to depressing syndromes. In the only study that directly associated depressive indicators in burned out employees and clinically miserable patients, no diagnostically important differences were found between the groups: Employees who are burned out are said to have many depressive indications as clinically unhappy patients. Moreover, a recent study by Bianchi, Schonfeld, and Laurent exhibited that about majority of the workers have diagnosed for despair, signifying that burnout might be a gloomy syndrome rather than a distinct entity [11]. Clinical psychologist Herbert Freudenberger initially identified the paradigm "burnout" in the 1970s. Social psychologists Christina Maslach and Susan Jackson developed which is the preferred instrument for judging burnout, namely, the Maslach Burnout Inventory. The Maslach Burnout Inventory recognizes exhaustion as a three- dimensional syndrome which is a culmination exhaustion, cynicism, and inefficacy. FEW COLLECTED WORKS OF PREVIOUS RESEARCH Molly H. Fisher, Factors Influencing Stress, Burnout, and Retention of Secondary Teachers, Current issues in education, Vol. 14, Issue No. 1. This study examines the stress, burnout, satisfaction, and preventive coping skills of nearly 400 secondary teachers to determine variables contributing to these major factors influencing teachers. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistics were conducted that found the burnout levels between new and experienced teachers are significantly different, with novice teachers having higher burnout, but their difference in stress levels was not statistically significant. Prof. Dr. Dale, Melek Eker, Dr. Adam Anbar. Determining The Factors That Affect Burnout Among Academicians, Ankara University. The purpose of this study was to measure the levels of burnout among academicians and to investigate the factors that affect burnout levels of academicians in Turkey. The data were obtained by using sociodemographic data form, Maslach Burnout Inventory and “work and work environment” scale from 160 academicians that have been working in accounting and finance sub-department in Faculties of Economics and Administrative Sciences in 78 public and private universities. In the analysis of data, descriptive statistic (mean and standard deviation), correlation analysis, factor analysis and discriminant function analysis were used. The factor analysis of the 13 items which have possible effect on burnout among academicians revealed five factors: Work environment, administrative workload, academic workload, promotion and evaluation and research fund. Flitz Bilge, Mehila Tuzgol Dost and Bayram Cetin. Factors Affecting Burnout and School Engagement among High School Students: Study Habits, Self-Efficacy Beliefs, and Academic Success, Educational sciences: Theory & Practice, Vol. 14, Issue. 5, 2014. This study examines high school students’ levels of burnout and school http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 165 editor@iaeme.com
- Dr. M. Surya Kumar engagement with respect to academic success, study habits, and self-efficacy beliefs. The data were gathered during the 2011–2012 school year from 633 students attending six high schools located in Ankara, Turkey. The analyses were conducted on responses from 605 students. The research methods included the Personal Information Form comprising items about students’ demographic characteristics, the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Form, the Utrecht School Engagement Scale, the Study Habits Inventory, and the Scale for Self-Efficacy Expectations among Adolescents. The data were analyzed with multivariate analysis of variance. The results suggested that students with low self-efficacy beliefs had higher burnout levels. In addition, students with inadequate study skills and those with low self- efficacy beliefs were at higher risk of losing their beliefs INTENTIONS OF THE STUDY The intentions of the study are to, Checking the demographics of the respondents To scrutinize the factors responsible for burnout METHODOLOGY The study is exploratory in nature. Survey method was implemented and the study is piloted amongst college students at Salem City, Tamilnadu. The respondents for the study is confined to 500 college students. Proportionally stratified random sampling technique was adopted. INVESTIGATION AND INTERPRETATION Table 1 Classification on the basis of family type Family Type Numbers Percentage Joint 257 51.40 Nuclear 243 48.60 Total 500 100.00 Source: Computed and calculated through questionnaire http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 166 editor@iaeme.com
- Factors Responsible For Burnout Among College Students Exhibit 1 Family type of the faculty members 257 260 255 250 243 245 240 235 Joint Nuclear Interpretation Majority of the faculty members which is 51.40% (257) of them belong to joint family type and the remaining 48.60% (243) of them belong to nuclear family type. Table 2 Percentage Positions and Their Corresponding Garrets Table Value Rank Percentage Position Garett’s Table Value 1 100(1-0.5)/5=10 76 2 100(2-0.5)/5=30 61 3 100(3-0.5)/5=50 50 4 100(4-0.5)/5=70 40 5 100(5-0.5)/5=90 25 Source: Computed and calculated through questionnaire The table portrays percentage positions for the ranks 1,2,3,4 and 5 and their corresponding Garett’s table values. For rank 1 the calculated percentage position value is 10 and the table value is 76, this value is given in the garret ranking table for the percentage 9.17 which is near 10. As like for all the calculated positions, the table values are referred from garrets ranking table. Burnout The below table shows the number of respondents ranking the factors as 1,2,3,4 and 5 for the preference of the causes accountable for burnout. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 167 editor@iaeme.com
- Dr. M. Surya Kumar Table 3 Factors responsible for burnout-GARRETT I II III IV V Total Mean Factor Total Rank (76) (61) (50) (40) (25) Score Score Lack of proper 54 42 44 58 46 262 24980 49.96 5 communication 4104 2562 2200 2320 1600 262 12786 48.801 Hefty syllabus 52 44 54 56 56 262 26798 53.60 4 3952 2684 2700 2240 1400 262 12976 49.526 Isolation 56 52 44 46 64 262 27892 55.78 2 4256 3172 2200 1840 1600 262 13068 49.877 Fitting in the 54 54 44 42 68 262 23762 47.52 3 environment 4104 3294 2200 1680 1700 262 12978 49.534 Pressure and 68 48 56 42 48 262 22466 44.93 1 Expectations 5168 2928 2800 1680 1200 262 13776 52.580 Source: Computed and calculated through questionnaire Interpretation It is known from the above table that according to Garett’s ranking the factors which induces the respondents to show the factors responsible for burnout are in this order namely Pressure and Expectations, Isolation, Fitting in the environment, Hefty Syllabus and Lack of Proper Communication. It is resulted that Pressure and Expectation is ranked as first and Isolation is ranked second. CONCLUSION An array of emotive overwork and ensuing emotional exhaustion is at the soul of the burnout syndrome. People often get involved emotionally and feels overwhelmed by the emotional demands imposed by other people. The response to this situation is emotional exhaustion. Nowadays, Students are facing a lot of emotional exhaustion through various ways which makes really burned out. So the students must have a pre-planned life and they must learn to improve their communication skills and mainly reduce their pressure & expectations, which will avoid unwanted exhaustion and burnout. HOW THE PRESENT STUDY CAN BE EXTENDED? The future scope for the current study can be supported further on “Factors responsible for burnout among IT sector Employees”. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 168 editor@iaeme.com
- Factors Responsible For Burnout Among College Students REFERENCES [1] C.R.Kothari, Research methodology methods and techniques, Wishwa prakashan, second edition-1990. [2] Moos, R. H. and Trickett, E. J. (1974) Manual Classroom Environment Scale. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. [3] Schaufeli, W. B., Maslach, C. and Marek, T. (1993 Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis. [4] Maslach, C. (1982). Burnout: The cost of caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [5] James H. Huphrey, Stress education for college students, Novinko Books, 2003. [6] Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Isabel M. Martínez, Alexandra Marques Pinto, Marisa Salanova and Arnold B. Bakker. Burnout and Engagement In University Students A Cross-National Study, Journal Of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 33 No. 5, September 2002 464-481 [7] Molly H. Fisher, Factors Influencing Stress, Burnout, and Retention of Secondary Teachers, Current issues in education, Vol. 14, Issue No. 1 [8] Prof. Dr. Dale, Melek Eker, Dr. Adam Anbar. Determining The Factors That Affect Burnout Among Academicians, Ankara University [9] Flitz Bilge, Mehila Tuzgol Dost and Bayram Cetin. Factors Affecting Burnout and School Engagement among High School Students: Study Habits, Self- Efficacy Beliefs, and Academic Success, Educational sciences: Theory & Practice, Vol. 14, Issue. 5, 2014 [10] M.Surya Kumar and Dr.N.Shani, A Study On Quality of Work Life Among The Employees At Metro Engineering Private Limited. International Journal of Management, 4(1), 2013, pp. 01–05 [11] M.Surya Kumar and Dr.N.Shani, Strategic Talent Management. International Journal of Management, 3(3), 2012, pp. 100 – 104 [12] M.Surya Kumar, Impact of Burnout on Usage of Technology. International Journal of Management, 6(12), 2015, pp. 89–96. [13] http://www.theprospect.net/3-reasons-youre-experiencing-college-burnout- how-to-deal-15110 [14] http://research.omicsgroup.org/index.php/Burnout_(psychology) http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 169 editor@iaeme.com
Chính trị học
Báo chí - Truyền thông
Xã hội học
Giáo dục học
Tâm lý học
Lịch sử - Văn hoá
Triết học
Ngôn ngữ học
Thư viện thông tin
Văn học nước ngoài
Ngư nghiệp
Hành chính - Pháp luật
Địa lý - Địa danh
Văn học Việt nam
Lịch sử Đảng
CNXH - KH
Tư Tưởng HCM
Ngụ ngôn - Cổ tích
Ca dao - Tục ngữ
Hoá học
Sinh học
Y khoa - Dược
Kinh tế học