GUIDANCE NOTE ON RECOVERY INFRASTRUCTURE

G U I D A N C E N O T E O N R E C O V E R Y : I N F R A S T R U C T U R E CORPORATE GRAPHICS AND COMMUNICATIONS–– AdministrativeStyleSheet GraphicDesignInstitute 12345MainStreet•Suite 100 Spokane,WA 56503 Phone 203.555.0167 •Fax203.555.0168 Table of Content| i G U I D A N C E N O T E O N R E C O V E R Y : I N F R A S T R U C T U R E Acknowledgement | i G U I D A N C E N O T E O N R E C O V E R Y : I N F R A S T R U C T U R E TableofContents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................I INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. III INTRODUCTION TO INFRASTRUCTURE RECOVERY................................................ 1 RECONSTRUCTION PLANNING, PRIORITIZATION, AND COORDINATION.............. 13 Case 1: Earthquake and Tsunami, Indonesia, 2004------------------------------------------18 Case 2: Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, Gulf Coast, USA, 2005-------------------------------20 Case 3: Wenchuan Earthquake, China, 2008--------------------------------------------------21 Case 4: Cyclone Sidr, Bangladesh, 2007 --------------------------------------------------------23 Case 5: Mildwest Floods, Missouri, USA, 1993 -----------------------------------------------25 Case 6: Earthquake and Tsunami, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, 2004-------------------------25 Case 7: Great Hanshin Earthquake, Kobe, Japan, 1995-------------------------------------27 Case 8: Tsunami, Solomon Islands, 2004-------------------------------------------------------29 Case 9: Earthquakes (multiple), California, USA----------------------------------------------30 Case 10: Tsunami, Aceh, Indonesia, 2004------------------------------------------------------32 FUNDING INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION..................................................... 37 Case 11: Multiple Events, Canada----------------------------------------------------------------38 Case 12: Wenchuan Earthquake, China, 2008 ------------------------------------------------39 Case 13: Earthquake and Tsunami, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, 2004-----------------------40 Case 14: Loma Prieta Earthquake, California, USA, 1989 ----------------------------------42 Case 15: Northridge Earthquake, California, USA, 1994------------------------------------43 Case 16: Flores Earthquake, Indonesia, 1992-------------------------------------------------43 Case 17: Earthquake, Haiti, 2010-----------------------------------------------------------------44 Case 18: Paris Cholera Epidemic, 1832 ---------------------------------------------------------45 Case 19: Wenchuan Earthquake, China, 2009 ------------------------------------------------46 UPGRADING OF INFRASTRUCTURE..................................................................... 48 Case 20: Wenchuan Earthquake, China, 2008 ------------------------------------------------49 Case 21: Earthquake, Marathwada, India, 1993----------------------------------------------50 Case 22: Tsunami, Sri Lanka, 2004---------------------------------------------------------------51 Case 23: The Manawatu Flood, New Zealand, 2005-----------------------------------------55 Case 24: Earthquake and Tsunami, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, 2004-----------------------57 Case 25: Flores Earthquake, Indonesia, 1992-------------------------------------------------58 Case 26: Earthquakes (multiple), Turkey, 1990’s---------------------------------------------59 Case 27: Earthquake, Bhuj, India, 2001---------------------------------------------------------60 Case 28: Tsunami, Maldives, 2004---------------------------------------------------------------63 Case 29: Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, Gulf Coast, USA, 2005-----------------------------64 LABOR, MATERIALS, AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE............................................. 67 Case 30: Matata Flood, New Zealand, 2005---------------------------------------------------72 Table of Content | i G U I D A N C E N O T E O N R E C O V E R Y : I N F R A S T R U C T U R E Case 31: Great Hanshin Earthquake, Kobe, Japan, 1995 -----------------------------------74 Case 32: Flores Earthquake, Indonesia, 1992-------------------------------------------------75 Case 33: Hurricane Mitch, Honduras, 1998----------------------------------------------------76 Case 34: Earthquake and Tsunami, Aceh and Nias, Indonesia, 2004--------------------78 Case 35: Hurricane Ivan, Granada, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------80 ANNEXES........................................................................................................... 82 ANNEX 1: PRE DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING ...................................................................82 Case 35: Pre-Disaster Recovery Planning in the Caribbean.-------------------------------84 ANNEX 2: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................86 ANNEX 3: RESOURCES CITED ...........................................................................................87 Table of Content | ii G U I D A N C E N O T E O N R E C O V E R Y : I N F R A S T R U C T U R E Introduction Purpose There is currently an abundance of documents, plans and policies that address common issues faced in the mitigation, preparedness and relief phases of natural disaster management. Yet for disaster recovery planners and policy makers, there is no cohesive documented body of knowledge. It is conceded that preventive measures are vital to reducing the more costly efforts of responding to disasters. Nevertheless, in the post disaster situation, the availability of knowledge products reflecting past practices and lessons learned is critical for effective and sustainable recovery. Unquestionably, a wealth of experience and expertise exists within governments and organizations; however the majority of this knowledge is never documented, compiled, nor shared. Filling this knowledge gap is a key objective of the International Recovery Platform and The Guidance Note on Recovery: Infrastructure, along with its companion booklets, is an initial step in documenting, collecting and sharing disaster recovery experiences and lessons. IRP hopes that this collection of the successes and failures ofpast experiences in disaster recovery will serve to inform the planning and implementation of future recovery initiatives. The aim is not to recommend actions, but to place before the reader a menuofoptions. Audience The Guidance Note on Recovery: Infrastructure is primarily intended for use by policymakers, planners, and implementers of local, regional and national government bodies interested or engaged in facilitating a more responsive, sustainable, and risk-reducing recovery process. Yet, IRP recognizes that governments are not the sole actors in disaster recovery and believes that the experiences collected in this document can benefitthe manyotherpartners working togetherto buildbackbetter. Content The Guidance Note on Recovery: Infrastructure draws from documented experiences of past and present recovery efforts, collected through a desk review and consultations with relevant experts. These experiences and lessons learned are classified into four major issues: 1. Reconstruction Planning, Prioritization, and Coordination 2. Funding Infrastructure Construction 3. Upgrading of Infrastructure 4. Labor, Materials, and Technical Assistance The materials are presented in the form of cases. The document provides analysis of many of the cases, highlighting key lessons and noting points of caution and clarification. Introduction| iii ... - tailieumienphi.vn