of x

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Đăng ngày | Thể loại: | Lần tải: 0 | Lần xem: 0 | Page: 35 | FileSize: 0.16 M | File type: PDF
0 lần xem

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. When you join a village bank you have to put in many hours of hard work. You also have to contribute to the cost of the books that teach you how to read and how to operate your village bank. Village bank members expect one another to be trustworthy, cooperative and open to new ideas. Village bank women do not blindly follow the old ways passed down by their mothers and grandmothers. They look honestly at the traditions and practices around them, and they are ready to change those traditions that are holding them back and adopt modern.... Giống các tài liệu khác được bạn đọc chia sẽ hoặc do sưu tầm lại và chia sẽ lại cho các bạn với mục đích học tập , chúng tôi không thu tiền từ bạn đọc ,nếu phát hiện nội dung phi phạm bản quyền hoặc vi phạm pháp luật xin thông báo cho website ,Ngoài giáo án bài giảng này, bạn có thể tải đồ án thạc sĩ tiến sĩ phục vụ nghiên cứu Một ít tài liệu download sai font không xem được, thì do máy tính bạn không hỗ trợ font củ, bạn tải các font .vntime củ về cài sẽ xem được.

https://tailieumienphi.vn/doc/for-publication-united-states-court-of-appeals-for-the-ninth-circuit-2zj3tq.html

Nội dung

tailieumienphi.vn xin giới thiệu tới cộng đồng thư viện FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.Để chia sẽ thêm cho bạn đọc nguồn tài liệu Tài Chính - Ngân Hàng,Ngân hàng - Tín dụng phục vụ cho học tập.Xin mời thành viên đang cần cùng tham khảo ,Thư viện FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT trong danh mục ,Tài Chính - Ngân Hàng,Ngân hàng - Tín dụng được chia sẽ bởi thành viên nganhangtindung tới học sinh/sinh viên nhằm mục tiêu nghiên cứu , tài liệu này đã chia sẽ vào danh mục Tài Chính - Ngân Hàng,Ngân hàng - Tín dụng , có tổng cộng 35 page , thuộc thể loại .PDF, cùng danh mục còn có Research recommendations, Full guideline, Quick reference guide, Alkaline and Saline, Constraints of Broad, Acre Cropping ,bạn có thể download miễn phí , hãy giới thiệu cho cộng đồng cùng xem . Để tải file về, các bạn click chuột nút download bên dưới
When you join a village bank you have to put in many hours of hard work, bên cạnh đó You also , bên cạnh đó have to contribute to the cost of the books that teach you how to read and how to , kế tiếp là operate your village bank, cho biết thêm , nói thêm là , cho biết thêm Village bank members expect one another to be trustworthy, cooperative and open to , kế tiếp là new ideas, nói thêm là Village bank women do not blindly follow the old ways passed down by , bên cạnh đó their mothers and grandmothers, cho biết thêm They look honestly at the traditions and practices ,còn cho biết thêm around them, and they are ready to change those traditions that are holding them back , tiếp theo là and adopt modern, ngoài ra FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VERONICA GUTIERREZ; ERIN WALKER; WILLIAM SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v, cho biết thêm No, nói thêm là 10-16959 D, thêm nữa C, ngoài ra No, tiếp theo là 3:07-cv-05923- WHA WELLS FARGO BANK,NA, Defendant-Appellant, tiếp theo là VERONICA GUTIERREZ; ERIN WALKER; WILLIAM SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v, nói thêm No, kế tiếp là 10-17468 D,còn cho biết thêm C, nói thêm là No, thêm nữa 3:07-cv-05923- WHA WELLS FARGO BANK,NA, Defendant-Appellant, nói thêm 2 GUTIERREZ V, bên cạnh đó WELLS FARGO VERONICA GUTIERREZ; ERIN WALKER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and WILLIAM SMI
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VERONICA GUTIERREZ; ERIN WALKER; WILLIAM SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. No. 10-16959 D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05923- WHA WELLS FARGO BANK,NA, Defendant-Appellant. VERONICA GUTIERREZ; ERIN WALKER; WILLIAM SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. No. 10-17468 D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05923- WHA WELLS FARGO BANK,NA, Defendant-Appellant. 2 GUTIERREZ V.WELLS FARGO VERONICA GUTIERREZ; ERIN WALKER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and WILLIAM SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. 10-17689 D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05923- WHA OPINION v. WELLS FARGO BANK,NA, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 15, 2012—San Francisco, California Filed December 26, 2012 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, M. Margaret McKeown, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge McKeown GUTIERREZ V.WELLS FARGO 3 SUMMARY* Banking Law The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s issuance of a permanent injunction requiring Wells Fargo Bank to cease its practice of charging overdraft fees based on its posting in high-to-low order for all debit-card transactions, and $203 million restitution order to a certified class of bank customers. The district court held that the bank’s actions were both “unfair” and “fraudulent” under California’s Unfair Competition Law. As a threshold matter, the panel held that given the circumstances of this case, the district court’s judgment should not be vacated on the basis of the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct.1740(2011), and denied the bank’s post-judgment, post-appeal request that this dispute be arbitrated under a permissive arbitration clause contained in a contract between the parties. The panel also held that the Bank’s decision to post payments to checking accounts in a particular order is a federally authorized pricingdecision. The panel further held that the National Bank Act preempts the application of the * This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader. 4 GUTIERREZ V.WELLS FARGO unfair business practices prong of California’s Unfair Competition Law to dictate a national bank’s order of posting. The panel also held that both the imposition of affirmative disclosure requirements and liability based on failure to disclose are preempted. The panel held that the National Bank Act does not preempt the claim for affirmative misrepresentations under the fraudulent prong of the Unfair Competition Law. The panel vacated the injunction because each of its terms dictated relief relating to the posting order, which was preempted. The panel also vacated the restitution order. COUNSEL Jordan Elias, Richard M. Heimann, Roger N. Heller, Michael W. Sobol (argued), and Alison M. Stocking, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, California; Jae K. Kim and Richard D. McCune, McCune & Wright, LLP, Redlands, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellees. Robert A. Long, Jr. (argued), Mark William Mosier, Keith A. Noreika, and Stuart C. Stock, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, D.C.; David M. Jolley and Sonya D. Winner, Covington & Burling, LLP, SanFrancisco, California; Emily Johnson Henn, Covington & Burling LLP, Redwood Shores, California for Defendant-Appellant. Julia B. Strickland, Lisa M. Simonetti, and David W. Moon, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Amici Curiae American Bankers Association and California Bankers Association. GUTIERREZ V.WELLS FARGO 5 Nina F. Simon, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae Center for Responsible Lending, Consumer Federation of America, California Reinvestment Coalition, and Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: Bank fees, like taxes, are ubiquitous. And, like taxes, bank fees are unlikely to go away any time soon. The question we consider here is the extent to which overdraft fees imposed by a national bank are subject to state regulation. At issue is a bookkeepingdevice, known as “high-to-low” posting, which has the potential to multiply overdraft fees, turning a single overdraft into many such overdrafts. The revenue from overdraft fees is massive. Between 2005 and 2007, Wells Fargo Bank (“Wells Fargo”) assessed over $1.4 billion in overdraft fees. Disturbed by the number of overdrafts caused by small, everyday debit-card purchases, Veronica Gutierrez and Erin Walker (collectively “Gutierrez”) sued Wells Fargo under California state law for engaging in unfair business practices by imposing overdraft fees based on the high-to-low posting order and for engaging in fraudulent business practices by misleading clients as to the actual posting order used by the bank. The district court found that “the bank’s dominant, indeed sole, motive” for choosing high-to-low posting “was to maximize the number of overdrafts and squeeze as much as ... - tailieumienphi.vn 737136

Sponsor Documents